↓ Skip to main content

A survey of American neurologists about brain death: understanding the conceptual basis and diagnostic tests for brain death

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A survey of American neurologists about brain death: understanding the conceptual basis and diagnostic tests for brain death
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, February 2012
DOI 10.1186/2110-5820-2-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ari R Joffe, Natalie R Anton, Jonathan P Duff, Allan deCaen

Abstract

Neurologists often diagnose brain death (BD) and explain BD to families in the intensive care unit. This study was designed to determine whether neurologists agree with the standard concept of death (irreversible loss of integrative unity of the organism) and understand the state of the brain when BD is diagnosed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 38 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 21%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Researcher 4 10%
Other 12 29%
Unknown 2 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 60%
Arts and Humanities 4 10%
Social Sciences 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 2 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,768,034
of 25,623,883 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#370
of 1,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,160
of 169,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,623,883 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.