↓ Skip to main content

Strategies for the removal of short-term indwelling urethral catheters in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Strategies for the removal of short-term indwelling urethral catheters in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004011.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rhonda Griffiths, Ritin Fernandez

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 99 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 18%
Researcher 19 18%
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 13%
Student > Postgraduate 10 10%
Other 21 20%
Unknown 9 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 7%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 16 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2018.
All research outputs
#2,078,552
of 13,999,346 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,798
of 10,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,897
of 268,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#140
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,999,346 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,793 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.