↓ Skip to main content

Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 The Extended Family of Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Global RT-PCR and RT-qPCR Analysis of the mRNA Expression of the Human PTPome
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Expression, Purification, and Kinetic Analysis of PTP Domains
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Peptide Microarrays for Real-Time Kinetic Profiling of Tyrosine Phosphatase Activity of Recombinant Phosphatases and Phosphatases in Lysates of Cells or Tissue Samples
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Tailor-Made Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases: In Vitro Site-Directed Mutagenesis of PTEN and PTPRZ-B
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Assays to Measure PTEN Lipid Phosphatase Activity In Vitro from Purified Enzyme or Immunoprecipitates
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Assessing the Biological Activity of the Glucan Phosphatase Laforin
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Discovery and Evaluation of PRL Trimer Disruptors for Novel Anticancer Agents
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Analyzing Pseudophosphatase Function
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Crystallization of PTP Domains
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 NMR Spectroscopy to Study MAP Kinase Binding to MAP Kinase Phosphatases
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Visualizing and Quantitating the Spatiotemporal Regulation of Ras/ERK Signaling by Dual-Specificity Mitogen-Activated Protein Phosphatases (MKPs)
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Use of Dominant-Negative/Substrate Trapping PTP Mutations to Search for PTP Interactors/Substrates
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Production of Osteoclasts for Studying Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase Signaling
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Functional Analysis of Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases in Thrombosis and Hemostasis
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Functional Analysis of Dual-Specificity Protein Phosphatases in Angiogenesis
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Studying Protein-Tyrosine Phosphatases in Zebrafish
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases
Attention for Chapter 8: Discovery and Evaluation of PRL Trimer Disruptors for Novel Anticancer Agents
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Discovery and Evaluation of PRL Trimer Disruptors for Novel Anticancer Agents
Chapter number 8
Book title
Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-3746-2_8
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-3744-8, 978-1-4939-3746-2
Authors

Yunpeng Bai, Zhi-Hong Yu, Zhong-Yin Zhang, Bai, Yunpeng, Yu, Zhi-Hong, Zhang, Zhong-Yin

Abstract

Overexpression of PRL phosphatases (PRL1, PRL2, and PRL3) has been found in a variety of late-stage tumors and their distant metastatic sites. Therefore, the oncogenic PRL phosphatases represent intriguing targets for cancer therapy. There is considerable interest in identifying small molecule inhibitors targeting PRLs as novel anticancer agents. However, it has been difficult to acquire phosphatase activity-based PRL inhibitors due to the unusual wide and shallow catalytic pockets of PRLs revealed by crystal structure studies. Here, we present a novel method to identify PRL1 inhibitors by targeting the PRL1 trimer interface and the procedure to characterize their biochemical and cellular activity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 40%
Unspecified 1 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 40%
Unspecified 1 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 20%
Engineering 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2018.
All research outputs
#15,487,739
of 23,015,156 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,388
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#232,205
of 394,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#546
of 1,471 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,015,156 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,707 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,471 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.