↓ Skip to main content

Global hotspots and correlates of alien species richness across taxonomic groups

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Ecology & Evolution, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#49 of 751)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
39 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
315 tweeters
facebook
20 Facebook pages
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
277 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
Title
Global hotspots and correlates of alien species richness across taxonomic groups
Published in
Nature Ecology & Evolution, June 2017
DOI 10.1038/s41559-017-0186
Authors

Wayne Dawson, Dietmar Moser, Mark van Kleunen, Holger Kreft, Jan Pergl, Petr Pyšek, Patrick Weigelt, Marten Winter, Bernd Lenzner, Tim M. Blackburn, Ellie E. Dyer, Phillip Cassey, Sally L. Scrivens, Evan P. Economo, Benoit Guénard, César Capinha, Hanno Seebens, Pablo García-Díaz, Wolfgang Nentwig, Emili García-Berthou, Christine Casal, Nicholas E. Mandrak, Pam Fuller, Carsten Meyer, Franz Essl, Dawson, Wayne, Moser, Dietmar, van Kleunen, Mark, Kreft, Holger, Pergl, Jan, Pysek, Petr, Weigelt, Patrick, Winter, Marten, Lenzner, Bernd, Blackburn, Tim M., Dyer, Ellie, Cassey, Phillip, Scrivens, Sally-Louise, Economo, Evan P., Guenard, Benoit, Capinha, Cesar, Seebens, Hanno, Garcia-Diaz, Pablo, Nentwig, Wolfgang, Garcia-Berthou, Emili, Casal, Christine, Mandrak, Nicholas E., Fuller, Pam, Meyer, Carsten, Essl, Franz

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 315 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 277 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 269 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 75 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 69 25%
Student > Master 34 12%
Student > Bachelor 23 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 7%
Other 57 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 152 55%
Environmental Science 85 31%
Unspecified 20 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Computer Science 4 1%
Other 11 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 536. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2018.
All research outputs
#12,117
of 12,496,745 outputs
Outputs from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#49
of 751 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#650
of 265,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#7
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,496,745 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 751 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 148.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.