You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Age is not a contraindication to home‐based dialysis – Quality‐of‐Life outcomes favour older patients on peritoneal dialysis regimes relative to younger patients
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Advanced Nursing, February 2014
|
DOI | 10.1111/jan.12355 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Konstadina Griva, Zhenli Yu, Sally Chan, Thanaletchumi Krisnasamy, Ruyani Bte Abu Yamin, Faezah Bte Zakaria, Sin Yan Wu, Elizabeth Oei, Marjorie Foo |
Abstract |
To compare Quality of Life, anxiety and depression between older (≥65 years) and younger (<65 years) patients across automated peritoneal dialysis and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 33% |
Canada | 1 | 11% |
Spain | 1 | 11% |
Indonesia | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 16% |
Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
Librarian | 5 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 9% |
Other | 14 | 24% |
Unknown | 13 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 24% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 19% |
Psychology | 5 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 10% |
Unknown | 16 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2014.
All research outputs
#6,175,305
of 24,542,484 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Advanced Nursing
#2,258
of 5,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,524
of 317,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Advanced Nursing
#25
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,542,484 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,487 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,915 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.