↓ Skip to main content

Receptor Binding Techniques

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter: Receptor databases and computational websites for ligand binding.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Receptor databases and computational websites for ligand binding.
Book title
Receptor Binding Techniques
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, May 2005
DOI 10.1385/1-59259-927-3:001
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-58829-420-3, 978-1-59259-927-1
Authors

Brinda K. Rana, Paul A. Insel

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 2 50%
Researcher 1 25%
Professor 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 50%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2012.
All research outputs
#8,938,805
of 11,192,687 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#3,836
of 7,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,436
of 106,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#26
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,192,687 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,599 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.