You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
T-Cell-Mediated Cross-Protective Immunity
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 20 |
Book title |
Vaccines for Invasive Fungal Infections
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, June 2017
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-7104-6_20 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-7103-9, 978-1-4939-7104-6
|
Authors |
Khanna, Nina, Stuehler, Claudia, Nina Khanna, Claudia Stuehler Ph.D., Claudia Stuehler |
Editors |
Markus Kalkum, Margarita Semis |
Abstract |
Human invasive fungal infections are caused by different mold and yeast species. Hence, cross-reactive T cells that recognize conserved epitopes of various fungal pathogens are of special interest for vaccination protocols or adoptive T cell transfer. Here, we describe an ELISpot-based method to test cross-reactivity of T cell lines or clones to different molds and yeasts. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 1 | 100% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2017.
All research outputs
#15,464,404
of 22,979,862 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,379
of 13,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,216
of 317,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#111
of 304 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,979,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,147 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 304 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.