↓ Skip to main content

Declining survival of black brant from subarctic and arctic breeding areas

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Wildlife Management, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Declining survival of black brant from subarctic and arctic breeding areas
Published in
Journal of Wildlife Management, June 2017
DOI 10.1002/jwmg.21284
Authors

Leach, Alan G., Ward, David H., Sedinger, James S., Lindberg, Mark S., Boyd, W. Sean, Hupp, Jerry W., Ritchie, Robert J., Alan G. Leach, David H. Ward, James S. Sedinger, Mark S. Lindberg, W. Sean Boyd, Jerry W. Hupp, Robert J. Ritchie

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 32%
Student > Master 5 16%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Researcher 4 13%
Other 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 5 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 61%
Environmental Science 4 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Unknown 5 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2017.
All research outputs
#1,248,861
of 11,550,454 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wildlife Management
#141
of 1,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,109
of 268,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wildlife Management
#6
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,550,454 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,223 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.