↓ Skip to main content

Plant Argonaute Proteins

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Plant Argonaute Proteins'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Plant ARGONAUTEs: Features, Functions, and Unknowns
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Analysis of the Uridylation of Both ARGONAUTE-Bound MiRNAs and 5′ Cleavage Products of Their Target RNAs in Plants
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 In Vitro Formation of Plant RNA-Induced Silencing Complexes Using an Extract of Evacuolated Tobacco Protoplasts
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 In Vitro Analysis of ARGONAUTE-Mediated Target Cleavage and Translational Repression in Plants
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Establishment of an In Vivo ARGONAUTE Reporter System in Plants
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Immunoprecipitation and High-Throughput Sequencing of ARGONAUTE-Bound Target RNAs from Plants
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Identification of ARGONAUTE/Small RNA Cleavage Sites by Degradome Sequencing
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Dissecting the Subnuclear Localization Patterns of Argonaute Proteins and Other Components of the RNA-Directed DNA Methylation Pathway in Plants
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Detection of Argonaute 1 Association with Polysomes in Arabidopsis thaliana
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Functional Analysis of Arabidopsis ARGONAUTEs in Meiosis and DNA Repair
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Isolation and Characterization of ARGONAUTE Mutants in Chlamydomonas
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 ARGONAUTE Genes in Salvia miltiorrhiza: Identification, Characterization, and Genetic Transformation
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Cloning and Characterization of Argonaute Genes in Tomato
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Nonradioactive Detection of Small RNAs Using Digoxigenin-Labeled Probes
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Nonradioactive Plant Small RNA Detection Using Biotin-Labeled Probes
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Computational Analysis of Genome-Wide ARGONAUTE-Dependent DNA Methylation in Plants
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Structural and Functional Characterization of Plant ARGONAUTE MID Domains
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Identification and Analysis of WG/GW ARGONAUTE-Binding Domains
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Identification and Evolutionary Characterization of ARGONAUTE-Binding Platforms
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Phylogenetic and Evolutionary Analysis of Plant ARGONAUTES
Attention for Chapter 15: Nonradioactive Plant Small RNA Detection Using Biotin-Labeled Probes
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Nonradioactive Plant Small RNA Detection Using Biotin-Labeled Probes
Chapter number 15
Book title
Plant Argonaute Proteins
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7165-7_15
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7164-0, 978-1-4939-7165-7
Authors

Hu, Jun, Zhu, Yingguo, Jun Hu, Yingguo Zhu

Editors

Alberto Carbonell

Abstract

Small noncoding RNAs are essential for gene expression at transcriptional and posttranscriptional levels. Northern blot is the most used method for small RNA detection in tissues. Here we present an improved protocol for the Northern blot-based small RNA detection from plant tissues by using biotin-labeled probes. MicroRNAs and small interfering RNAs derived from Arabidopsis and Oryza sativa, respectively, have been detected with this methodology. Results suggest that this method is sensitive and efficient enough to detect small RNAs from plant tissues by using as low as 5 μg of total RNA. Furthermore, biotin-labeled probes are safer and easier to store for long term than radiolabeled probes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 67%
Student > Bachelor 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2017.
All research outputs
#14,067,995
of 22,981,247 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#3,957
of 13,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,739
of 317,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#62
of 301 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,981,247 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,148 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,529 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 301 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.