↓ Skip to main content

Group extensions and graphs

Overview of attention for article published in Expositiones Mathematicae, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Group extensions and graphs
Published in
Expositiones Mathematicae, January 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.exmath.2015.07.005
Authors

A. Ballester-Bolinches, E. Cosme-Llópez, R. Esteban-Romero

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 1 25%
Student > Bachelor 1 25%
Student > Postgraduate 1 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 2 50%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2017.
All research outputs
#11,160,950
of 12,545,515 outputs
Outputs from Expositiones Mathematicae
#39
of 43 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,188
of 264,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Expositiones Mathematicae
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,545,515 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one scored the same or higher as 4 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them