You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Brief school-based interventions and behavioural outcomes for substance-using adolescents
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008969.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carney T, Myers BJ, Louw J, Okwundu CI, Tara Carney, Bronwyn J Myers, Johann Louw, Charles I Okwundu, Carney, Tara, Myers, Bronwyn J, Louw, Johann, Okwundu, Charles I |
| Abstract |
Adolescent substance use is a major problem, in and of itself and because it acts as a risk factor for other problem behaviours. As substance use during adolescence can lead to adverse and often long-term health and social consequences, it is important to intervene early on in order to prevent progression to more severe problems. Brief interventions have been shown to reduce problematic substance use among adolescents and are especially useful for individuals who have moderately risky patterns of substance use. Such interventions can be conducted in school settings. This review set out to evaluate the effectiveness of brief school-based interventions for adolescent substance use. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 33% |
| Spain | 6 | 20% |
| Norway | 1 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 67% |
| Scientists | 6 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 154 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 26 | 17% |
| Unknown | 45 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 26% |
| Social Sciences | 22 | 14% |
| Psychology | 20 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Unknown | 45 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2014.
All research outputs
#2,095,990
of 25,698,912 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,418
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,466
of 324,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#83
of 219 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,698,912 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,338 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 219 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.