You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Efficient oligonucleotide probe selection for pan-genomic tiling arrays
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Bioinformatics, September 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2105-10-293 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adam M Phillippy, Xiangyu Deng, Wei Zhang, Steven L Salzberg |
| Abstract |
Array comparative genomic hybridization is a fast and cost-effective method for detecting, genotyping, and comparing the genomic sequence of unknown bacterial isolates. This method, as with all microarray applications, requires adequate coverage of probes targeting the regions of interest. An unbiased tiling of probes across the entire length of the genome is the most flexible design approach. However, such a whole-genome tiling requires that the genome sequence is known in advance. For the accurate analysis of uncharacterized bacteria, an array must query a fully representative set of sequences from the species' pan-genome. Prior microarrays have included only a single strain per array or the conserved sequences of gene families. These arrays omit potentially important genes and sequence variants from the pan-genome. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Finland | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 35 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 27% |
| Researcher | 11 | 27% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 51% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 17% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 2% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2014.
All research outputs
#15,293,290
of 22,743,667 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#5,370
of 7,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,791
of 81,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#45
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,743,667 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,055 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.