↓ Skip to main content

Neuronal nonlinearity explains greater visual spatial resolution for darks than lights

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
34 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
19 X users
facebook
11 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
126 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neuronal nonlinearity explains greater visual spatial resolution for darks than lights
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, February 2014
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1310442111
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jens Kremkow, Jianzhong Jin, Stanley J. Komban, Yushi Wang, Reza Lashgari, Xiaobing Li, Michael Jansen, Qasim Zaidi, Jose-Manuel Alonso

Abstract

Astronomers and physicists noticed centuries ago that visual spatial resolution is higher for dark than light stimuli, but the neuronal mechanisms for this perceptual asymmetry remain unknown. Here we demonstrate that the asymmetry is caused by a neuronal nonlinearity in the early visual pathway. We show that neurons driven by darks (OFF neurons) increase their responses roughly linearly with luminance decrements, independent of the background luminance. However, neurons driven by lights (ON neurons) saturate their responses with small increases in luminance and need bright backgrounds to approach the linearity of OFF neurons. We show that, as a consequence of this difference in linearity, receptive fields are larger in ON than OFF thalamic neurons, and cortical neurons are more strongly driven by darks than lights at low spatial frequencies. This ON/OFF asymmetry in linearity could be demonstrated in the visual cortex of cats, monkeys, and humans and in the cat visual thalamus. Furthermore, in the cat visual thalamus, we show that the neuronal nonlinearity is present at the ON receptive field center of ON-center neurons and ON receptive field surround of OFF-center neurons, suggesting an origin at the level of the photoreceptor. These results demonstrate a fundamental difference in visual processing between ON and OFF channels and reveal a competitive advantage for OFF neurons over ON neurons at low spatial frequencies, which could be important during cortical development when retinal images are blurred by immature optics in infant eyes.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
France 2 1%
Canada 2 1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 167 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 28%
Researcher 29 16%
Student > Master 18 10%
Professor 16 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 15 8%
Other 36 20%
Unknown 18 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 42 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 22%
Psychology 26 14%
Engineering 12 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 7%
Other 29 16%
Unknown 23 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 311. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2016.
All research outputs
#117,370
of 26,538,386 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#2,472
of 105,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#987
of 331,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#26
of 1,009 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,538,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 105,173 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,009 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.