You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Central role for RNase YbeY in Hfq-dependent and Hfq-independent small-RNA regulation in bacteria
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-15-121 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shree P Pandey, Jonathan A Winkler, Hu Li, Diogo M Camacho, James J Collins, Graham C Walker |
| Abstract |
Conceptual parallels exist between bacterial and eukaryotic small-RNA (sRNA) pathways, yet relatively little is known about which protein may recognize and recruit bacterial sRNAs to interact with targets. In eukaryotes, Argonaute (AGO) proteins discharge such functions. The highly conserved bacterial YbeY RNase has structural similarities to the MID domain of AGOs. A limited study had indicated that in Sinorhizobium meliloti the YbeY ortholog regulates the accumulation of sRNAs as well as the target mRNAs, raising the possibility that YbeY may play a previously unrecognized role in bacterial sRNA regulation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| France | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Argentina | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 84 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 25% |
| Researcher | 19 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 13 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 48 | 52% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 20 | 22% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 2% |
| Psychology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 15 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2014.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#7,120
of 11,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207,072
of 329,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#126
of 210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,244 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,205 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.