↓ Skip to main content

International cancer seminars: a focus on esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Oncology, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
150 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
International cancer seminars: a focus on esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
Published in
Annals of Oncology, September 2017
DOI 10.1093/annonc/mdx279
Pubmed ID
Authors

G. Murphy, V. McCormack, B. Abedi-Ardekani, M. Arnold, M.C. Camargo, N.A. Dar, S.M. Dawsey, A. Etemadi, R.C. Fitzgerald, D.E. Fleischer, N.D. Freedman, A.M. Goldstein, S. Gopal, M. Hashemian, N. Hu, P.L. Hyland, B. Kaimila, F. Kamangar, R. Malekzadeh, C.G. Mathew, D. Menya, G. Mulima, M.M. Mwachiro, A. Mwasamwaja, N. Pritchett, Y.-L. Qiao, L.F. Ribeiro-Pinto, M. Ricciardone, J. Schüz, F. Sitas, P.R. Taylor, K. Van Loon, S.-M. Wang, W.-Q. Wei, C.P. Wild, C. Wu, C.C. Abnet, S.J. Chanock, P. Brennan

Abstract

The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and the US National Cancer Institute (NCI) have initiated a series of cancer-focused seminars [Scelo G, Hofmann JN, Banks RE et al. International cancer seminars: a focus on kidney cancer. Ann Oncol 2016; 27(8): 1382-1385]. In this, the second seminar, IARC and NCI convened a workshop in order to examine the state of the current science on esophageal squamous cell carcinoma etiology, genetics, early detection, treatment, and palliation, was reviewed to identify the most critical open research questions. The results of these discussions were summarized by formulating a series of 'difficult questions', which should inform and prioritize future research efforts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 98 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Postgraduate 9 9%
Researcher 7 7%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 26 27%
Unknown 32 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 35 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2022.
All research outputs
#14,292,663
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Oncology
#5,498
of 7,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,841
of 324,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Oncology
#161
of 252 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,861 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,537 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 252 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.