You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Trans-Proteomic Pipeline: A Pipeline for Proteomic Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 15 |
| Book title |
Proteome Bioinformatics
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, December 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-60761-444-9_15 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-60761-443-2, 978-1-60761-444-9
|
| Authors |
Patrick G. A. Pedrioli, Pedrioli, Patrick G. A. |
| Editors |
Simon J. Hubbard, Andrew R. Jones |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Russia | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 66 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 31% |
| Researcher | 15 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 16% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 7% |
| Professor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 39% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 23% |
| Engineering | 6 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2018.
All research outputs
#6,464,013
of 22,950,943 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#1,960
of 13,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,939
of 165,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#35
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,950,943 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,138 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.