You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A global analysis of the impacts of urbanization on bird and plant diversity reveals key anthropogenic drivers
|
---|---|
Published in |
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, April 2014
|
DOI | 10.1098/rspb.2013.3330 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Myla F. J. Aronson, Frank A. La Sorte, Charles H. Nilon, Madhusudan Katti, Mark A. Goddard, Christopher A. Lepczyk, Paige S. Warren, Nicholas S. G. Williams, Sarel Cilliers, Bruce Clarkson, Cynnamon Dobbs, Rebecca Dolan, Marcus Hedblom, Stefan Klotz, Jip Louwe Kooijmans, Ingolf Kühn, Ian MacGregor-Fors, Mark McDonnell, Ulla Mörtberg, Petr Pyšek, Stefan Siebert, Jessica Sushinsky, Peter Werner, Marten Winter |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 11 | 21% |
United Kingdom | 7 | 13% |
Canada | 4 | 8% |
Germany | 2 | 4% |
Spain | 2 | 4% |
Mexico | 2 | 4% |
Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 2% |
Poland | 1 | 2% |
Turkey | 1 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 8% |
Unknown | 17 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 35 | 67% |
Scientists | 14 | 27% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,971 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 9 | <1% |
Australia | 6 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 6 | <1% |
Mexico | 5 | <1% |
Brazil | 4 | <1% |
Germany | 3 | <1% |
Italy | 2 | <1% |
Canada | 2 | <1% |
Singapore | 2 | <1% |
Other | 14 | <1% |
Unknown | 1918 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 318 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 302 | 15% |
Student > Master | 298 | 15% |
Researcher | 281 | 14% |
Other | 83 | 4% |
Other | 283 | 14% |
Unknown | 406 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 756 | 38% |
Environmental Science | 490 | 25% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 49 | 2% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 39 | 2% |
Social Sciences | 24 | 1% |
Other | 120 | 6% |
Unknown | 493 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 300. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2024.
All research outputs
#117,543
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#248
of 11,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#922
of 242,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#5
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,429 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,006 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.