↓ Skip to main content

A global analysis of the impacts of urbanization on bird and plant diversity reveals key anthropogenic drivers

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
24 news outlets
blogs
10 blogs
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
52 X users
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
1152 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1968 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
A global analysis of the impacts of urbanization on bird and plant diversity reveals key anthropogenic drivers
Published in
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, April 2014
DOI 10.1098/rspb.2013.3330
Pubmed ID
Authors

Myla F. J. Aronson, Frank A. La Sorte, Charles H. Nilon, Madhusudan Katti, Mark A. Goddard, Christopher A. Lepczyk, Paige S. Warren, Nicholas S. G. Williams, Sarel Cilliers, Bruce Clarkson, Cynnamon Dobbs, Rebecca Dolan, Marcus Hedblom, Stefan Klotz, Jip Louwe Kooijmans, Ingolf Kühn, Ian MacGregor-Fors, Mark McDonnell, Ulla Mörtberg, Petr Pyšek, Stefan Siebert, Jessica Sushinsky, Peter Werner, Marten Winter

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,968 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 <1%
Australia 6 <1%
United Kingdom 6 <1%
Mexico 5 <1%
Brazil 4 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Singapore 2 <1%
Other 14 <1%
Unknown 1915 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 318 16%
Student > Bachelor 301 15%
Student > Master 297 15%
Researcher 280 14%
Other 83 4%
Other 283 14%
Unknown 406 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 754 38%
Environmental Science 489 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 49 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 39 2%
Social Sciences 24 1%
Other 120 6%
Unknown 493 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 300. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2024.
All research outputs
#117,543
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#248
of 11,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#922
of 242,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#5
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,429 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,006 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.