↓ Skip to main content

Fuel gain exceeding unity in an inertially confined fusion implosion

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
69 news outlets
blogs
19 blogs
twitter
214 tweeters
patent
2 patents
facebook
8 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
56 Google+ users
reddit
3 Redditors
video
4 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
513 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
395 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
Title
Fuel gain exceeding unity in an inertially confined fusion implosion
Published in
Nature, February 2014
DOI 10.1038/nature13008
Pubmed ID
Authors

O. A. Hurricane, D. A. Callahan, D. T. Casey, P. M. Celliers, C. Cerjan, E. L. Dewald, T. R. Dittrich, T. Döppner, D. E. Hinkel, L. F. Berzak Hopkins, J. L. Kline, S. Le Pape, T. Ma, A. G. MacPhee, J. L. Milovich, A. Pak, H.-S. Park, P. K. Patel, B. A. Remington, J. D. Salmonson, P. T. Springer, R. Tommasini

Abstract

Ignition is needed to make fusion energy a viable alternative energy source, but has yet to be achieved. A key step on the way to ignition is to have the energy generated through fusion reactions in an inertially confined fusion plasma exceed the amount of energy deposited into the deuterium-tritium fusion fuel and hotspot during the implosion process, resulting in a fuel gain greater than unity. Here we report the achievement of fusion fuel gains exceeding unity on the US National Ignition Facility using a 'high-foot' implosion method, which is a manipulation of the laser pulse shape in a way that reduces instability in the implosion. These experiments show an order-of-magnitude improvement in yield performance over past deuterium-tritium implosion experiments. We also see a significant contribution to the yield from α-particle self-heating and evidence for the 'bootstrapping' required to accelerate the deuterium-tritium fusion burn to eventually 'run away' and ignite.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 214 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 395 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 3%
United Kingdom 9 2%
Japan 4 1%
Mexico 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Costa Rica 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Other 9 2%
Unknown 351 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 112 28%
Researcher 95 24%
Student > Master 51 13%
Student > Bachelor 26 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 22 6%
Other 67 17%
Unknown 22 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 224 57%
Engineering 52 13%
Chemistry 24 6%
Materials Science 19 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 2%
Other 31 8%
Unknown 37 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 942. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2020.
All research outputs
#6,487
of 15,386,317 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#935
of 74,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66
of 258,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#20
of 931 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,386,317 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 74,503 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 83.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,200 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 931 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.