You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Alcohol Ingestion Impairs Maximal Post-Exercise Rates of Myofibrillar Protein Synthesis following a Single Bout of Concurrent Training
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0088384 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Evelyn B. Parr, Donny M. Camera, José L. Areta, Louise M. Burke, Stuart M. Phillips, John A. Hawley, Vernon G. Coffey |
| Abstract |
The culture in many team sports involves consumption of large amounts of alcohol after training/competition. The effect of such a practice on recovery processes underlying protein turnover in human skeletal muscle are unknown. We determined the effect of alcohol intake on rates of myofibrillar protein synthesis (MPS) following strenuous exercise with carbohydrate (CHO) or protein ingestion. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,596 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 256 | 16% |
| Spain | 166 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 152 | 10% |
| Australia | 51 | 3% |
| Canada | 48 | 3% |
| Japan | 33 | 2% |
| Mexico | 20 | 1% |
| Brazil | 17 | 1% |
| France | 14 | <1% |
| Other | 181 | 11% |
| Unknown | 658 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1184 | 74% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 227 | 14% |
| Scientists | 167 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 9 | <1% |
| Unknown | 9 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 536 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Denmark | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 520 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 101 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 91 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 52 | 10% |
| Researcher | 42 | 8% |
| Other | 33 | 6% |
| Other | 101 | 19% |
| Unknown | 116 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 145 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 70 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 65 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 51 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 4% |
| Other | 51 | 10% |
| Unknown | 132 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1724. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2024.
All research outputs
#6,177
of 25,714,183 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#68
of 223,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27
of 331,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3
of 5,823 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,714,183 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223,891 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,178 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,823 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.