↓ Skip to main content

Alcohol Ingestion Impairs Maximal Post-Exercise Rates of Myofibrillar Protein Synthesis following a Single Bout of Concurrent Training

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS ONE, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
26 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
967 tweeters
facebook
44 Facebook pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users
reddit
2 Redditors
video
17 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
265 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Alcohol Ingestion Impairs Maximal Post-Exercise Rates of Myofibrillar Protein Synthesis following a Single Bout of Concurrent Training
Published in
PLoS ONE, February 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0088384
Pubmed ID
Authors

Evelyn B. Parr, Donny M. Camera, José L. Areta, Louise M. Burke, Stuart M. Phillips, John A. Hawley, Vernon G. Coffey

Abstract

The culture in many team sports involves consumption of large amounts of alcohol after training/competition. The effect of such a practice on recovery processes underlying protein turnover in human skeletal muscle are unknown. We determined the effect of alcohol intake on rates of myofibrillar protein synthesis (MPS) following strenuous exercise with carbohydrate (CHO) or protein ingestion.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 967 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 265 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 1%
Australia 2 <1%
Norway 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 248 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 66 25%
Student > Bachelor 56 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 12%
Other 25 9%
Researcher 22 8%
Other 65 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 86 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 45 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 11%
Unspecified 25 9%
Other 37 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1028. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2019.
All research outputs
#3,510
of 13,248,777 outputs
Outputs from PLoS ONE
#72
of 141,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49
of 246,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS ONE
#5
of 8,494 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,248,777 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 141,822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,417 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8,494 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.