↓ Skip to main content

The palaeogenetics of cat dispersal in the ancient world

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Ecology & Evolution, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 2,294)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
123 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
507 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The palaeogenetics of cat dispersal in the ancient world
Published in
Nature Ecology & Evolution, June 2017
DOI 10.1038/s41559-017-0139
Authors

Claudio Ottoni, Wim Van Neer, Bea De Cupere, Julien Daligault, Silvia Guimaraes, Joris Peters, Nikolai Spassov, Mary E. Prendergast, Nicole Boivin, Arturo Morales-Muñiz, Adrian Bălăşescu, Cornelia Becker, Norbert Benecke, Adina Boroneant, Hijlke Buitenhuis, Jwana Chahoud, Alison Crowther, Laura Llorente, Nina Manaseryan, Hervé Monchot, Vedat Onar, Marta Osypińska, Olivier Putelat, Eréndira M. Quintana Morales, Jacqueline Studer, Ursula Wierer, Ronny Decorte, Thierry Grange, Eva-Maria Geigl

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 625 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 507 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Unknown 502 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 94 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 78 15%
Student > Bachelor 62 12%
Student > Master 57 11%
Other 31 6%
Other 78 15%
Unknown 107 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 173 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 67 13%
Environmental Science 25 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 20 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 16 3%
Other 76 15%
Unknown 130 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2185. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2024.
All research outputs
#4,174
of 26,591,670 outputs
Outputs from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#7
of 2,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52
of 335,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#1
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,591,670 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,294 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 153.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.