Report for: Causes of differences in model and satellite tropospheric warming rates

Title	Causes of differences in model and satellite tropospheric warming rates
Published in	Nature Geoscience, June 2017
DOI	10.1038/ngeo2973
Authors	Benjamin D. Santer, John C. Fyfe, Giuliana Pallotta, Gregory M. Flato, Gerald A. Meehl, Matthew H. England, Ed Hawkins, Michael E. Mann, Jeffrey F. Painter, Céline Bonfils, Ivana Cvijanovic, Carl Mears, Frank J. Wentz, Stephen Po-Chedley, Qiang Fu, Cheng-Zhi Zou

View on publisher site Alert me about new mentions

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 347 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Geographical breakdown

Country	Count	As %
United States	53	15%
United Kingdom	25	7%
Australia	25	7%
Canada	11	3%
Netherlands	11	3%
Brazil	3	<1%
South Africa	2	<1%
Germany	2	<1%
Austria	2	<1%
Other	34	10%
Unknown	179	52%

Demographic breakdown

Type	Count	As %
Members of the public	281	81%
Scientists	46	13%
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)	14	4%
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)	6	2%

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country	Count	As %
Unknown	109	100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status	Count	As %
Researcher	35	32%
Student > Ph. D. Student	19	17%
Professor	11	10%
Student > Bachelor	7	6%
Other	6	6%
Other	9	8%
Unknown	22	20%

Readers by discipline	Count	As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences	55	50%
Environmental Science	12	11%
Computer Science	3	3%
Engineering	2	2%
Chemistry	2	2%
Other	7	6%
Unknown	28	26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 399. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2023.

All research outputs

#67,555

of 23,864,690 outputs

Outputs from Nature Geoscience

#162

of 3,185 outputs

Outputs of similar age

#1,708

of 318,475 outputs

Outputs of similar age from Nature Geoscience

of 50 outputs

Altmetric has tracked 23,864,690 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.

So far Altmetric has tracked 3,185 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 101.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.

Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,475 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.

We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.

Causes of differences in model and satellite tropospheric warming rates

About this Attention Score

Mentioned by

Citations

Readers on

Twitter Demographics

Geographical breakdown

Demographic breakdown

Mendeley readers

Geographical breakdown

Demographic breakdown

Attention Score in Context