You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of a proposal for reliable low-cost grid power with 100% wind, water, and solar
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1610381114 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christopher T. M. Clack, Staffan A. Qvist, Jay Apt, Morgan Bazilian, Adam R. Brandt, Ken Caldeira, Steven J. Davis, Victor Diakov, Mark A. Handschy, Paul D. H. Hines, Paulina Jaramillo, Daniel M. Kammen, Jane C. S. Long, M. Granger Morgan, Adam Reed, Varun Sivaram, James Sweeney, George R. Tynan, David G. Victor, John P. Weyant, Jay F. Whitacre |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 802 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 172 | 21% |
| Canada | 38 | 5% |
| Australia | 37 | 5% |
| Spain | 29 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 28 | 3% |
| France | 27 | 3% |
| Sweden | 16 | 2% |
| Germany | 13 | 2% |
| Belgium | 10 | 1% |
| Other | 71 | 9% |
| Unknown | 361 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 671 | 84% |
| Scientists | 95 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 24 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | <1% |
| Unknown | 8 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 635 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 632 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 133 | 21% |
| Researcher | 112 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 83 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 52 | 8% |
| Professor | 38 | 6% |
| Other | 107 | 17% |
| Unknown | 110 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 107 | 17% |
| Energy | 82 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 67 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 24 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 23 | 4% |
| Other | 152 | 24% |
| Unknown | 180 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1790. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2024.
All research outputs
#5,775
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#184
of 103,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84
of 330,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#6
of 949 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,685 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,789 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 949 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.