You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genome-scale evidence of the nematode-arthropod clade
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, April 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1186/gb-2005-6-5-r41 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hernán Dopazo, Joaquín Dopazo |
| Abstract |
The issue of whether coelomates form a single clade, the Coelomata, or whether all animals that moult an exoskeleton (such as the coelomate arthropods and the pseudocoelomate nematodes) form a distinct clade, the Ecdysozoa, is the most puzzling issue in animal systematics and a major open-ended subject in evolutionary biology. Previous single-gene and genome-scale analyses designed to resolve the issue have produced contradictory results. Here we present the first genome-scale phylogenetic evidence that strongly supports the Ecdysozoa hypothesis. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 5 | 7% |
| United States | 4 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 1% |
| Czechia | 1 | 1% |
| Cuba | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 57 | 78% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 38% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 18% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 8% |
| Professor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 18% |
| Unknown | 3 | 4% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 52 | 71% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 10% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 2 | 3% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2013.
All research outputs
#6,754,661
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#3,158
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,144
of 69,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#8
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.