↓ Skip to main content

ErmineJ: Tool for functional analysis of gene expression data sets

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, November 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
231 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
connotea
5 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ErmineJ: Tool for functional analysis of gene expression data sets
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, November 2005
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-6-269
Pubmed ID
Authors

Homin K Lee, William Braynen, Kiran Keshav, Paul Pavlidis

Abstract

It is common for the results of a microarray study to be analyzed in the context of biologically-motivated groups of genes such as pathways or Gene Ontology categories. The most common method for such analysis uses the hypergeometric distribution (or a related technique) to look for "over-representation" of groups among genes selected as being differentially expressed or otherwise of interest based on a gene-by-gene analysis. However, this method suffers from some limitations, and biologist-friendly tools that implement alternatives have not been reported.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 5%
France 4 2%
Canada 3 2%
Brazil 2 1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 137 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 50 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 22%
Student > Master 18 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 8%
Professor 10 6%
Other 29 17%
Unknown 9 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 95 57%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 17%
Computer Science 16 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 4%
Engineering 5 3%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 10 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2016.
All research outputs
#3,943,346
of 22,743,667 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#1,511
of 7,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,366
of 60,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,743,667 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.