Title |
Mesoporous silica-based dosage forms improve bioavailability of poorly soluble drugs in pigs: case example fenofibrate
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, June 2017
|
DOI | 10.1111/jphp.12767 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Joseph P O'Shea, Kalpa Nagarsekar, Alena Wieber, Vanessa Witt, Elisabeth Herbert, Caitriona M O'Driscoll, Christoph Saal, Dieter Lubda, Brendan T Griffin, Jennifer B Dressman |
Abstract |
Mesoporous silicas (SLC) have demonstrated considerable potential to improve bioavailability of poorly soluble drugs by facilitating rapid dissolution and generating supersaturation. The addition of certain polymers can further enhance the dissolution of these formulations by preventing drug precipitation. This study uses fenofibrate as a model drug to investigate the performance of an SLC-based formulation, delivered with hydroxypropyl methylcellulose acetate succinate (HPMCAS) as a precipitation inhibitor, in pigs. The ability of biorelevant dissolution testing to predict the in vivo performance was also assessed. Fenofibrate-loaded mesoporous silica (FF-SLC), together with HPMCAS, displayed significant improvements in biorelevant dissolution tests relative to a reference formulation consisting of a physical mixture of crystalline fenofibrate with HPMCAS. In vivo assessment in fasted pigs demonstrated bioavailabilities of 86.69 ± 35.37% with combination of FF-SLC and HPMCAS in capsule form and 75.47 ± 14.58% as a suspension, compared to 19.92 ± 9.89% with the reference formulation. A positive correlation was identified between bioavailability and dissolution efficiency. The substantial improvements in bioavailability of fenofibrate from the SLC-based formulations confirm the ability of this formulation strategy to overcome the dissolution and solubility limitations, further raising the prospects of a future commercially available SLC-based formulation. |
X Demographics
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Ireland | 2 | 33% |
Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 13% |
Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
Professor | 3 | 8% |
Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
Researcher | 2 | 5% |
Other | 5 | 13% |
Unknown | 17 | 45% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 11 | 29% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 5% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 19 | 50% |