You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of peer support for people with severe mental illness
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Psychiatry, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-244x-14-39 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brynmor Lloyd-Evans, Evan Mayo-Wilson, Bronwyn Harrison, Hannah Istead, Ellie Brown, Stephen Pilling, Sonia Johnson, Tim Kendall |
| Abstract |
Little is known about whether peer support improves outcomes for people with severe mental illness. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 13 | 30% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| Spain | 2 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 5% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 19 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 56% |
| Scientists | 12 | 28% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 16% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 465 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 458 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 72 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 69 | 15% |
| Researcher | 67 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 42 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 34 | 7% |
| Other | 80 | 17% |
| Unknown | 101 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 143 | 31% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 52 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 51 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 42 | 9% |
| Unknown | 116 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2021.
All research outputs
#969,752
of 25,576,801 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#266
of 5,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,895
of 331,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#2
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,801 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,487 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.