↓ Skip to main content

Coastal habitat and biological community response to dam removal on the Elwha River

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Monographs, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Coastal habitat and biological community response to dam removal on the Elwha River
Published in
Ecological Monographs, September 2017
DOI 10.1002/ecm.1268
Authors

Melissa M. Foley, Jonathan A. Warrick, Andrew Ritchie, Andrew W. Stevens, Patrick B. Shafroth, Jeffrey J. Duda, Matthew M. Beirne, Rebecca Paradis, Guy Gelfenbaum, Randall McCoy, Erin S. Cubley

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 85 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 25%
Student > Bachelor 17 20%
Researcher 16 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Other 4 5%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 7 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 34 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 29%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 7%
Engineering 5 6%
Social Sciences 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 13 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2017.
All research outputs
#3,120,060
of 14,145,010 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Monographs
#236
of 649 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,772
of 266,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Monographs
#9
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,145,010 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 77th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 649 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,214 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.