↓ Skip to main content

Annotating genomes with massive-scale RNA sequencing

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, December 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
484 Mendeley
citeulike
30 CiteULike
connotea
7 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Annotating genomes with massive-scale RNA sequencing
Published in
Genome Biology, December 2008
DOI 10.1186/gb-2008-9-12-r175
Pubmed ID
Authors

France Denoeud, Jean-Marc Aury, Corinne Da Silva, Benjamin Noel, Odile Rogier, Massimo Delledonne, Michele Morgante, Giorgio Valle, Patrick Wincker, Claude Scarpelli, Olivier Jaillon, François Artiguenave

Abstract

Next generation technologies enable massive-scale cDNA sequencing (so-called RNA-Seq). Mainly because of the difficulty of aligning short reads on exon-exon junctions, no attempts have been made so far to use RNA-Seq for building gene models de novo, that is, in the absence of a set of known genes and/or splicing events. We present G-Mo.R-Se (Gene Modelling using RNA-Seq), an approach aimed at building gene models directly from RNA-Seq and demonstrate its utility on the grapevine genome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 484 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 25 5%
Italy 8 2%
United Kingdom 6 1%
Canada 4 <1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
China 3 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
Other 17 4%
Unknown 411 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 141 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 115 24%
Student > Master 45 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 32 7%
Professor 25 5%
Other 85 18%
Unknown 41 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 306 63%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 60 12%
Computer Science 29 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 3%
Chemistry 6 1%
Other 24 5%
Unknown 44 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2019.
All research outputs
#5,240,151
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#2,860
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,484
of 181,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#8
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,475 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.