↓ Skip to main content

Estimating incision healing rate for surgically implanted acoustic transmitters from recaptured fish

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Biotelemetry, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Estimating incision healing rate for surgically implanted acoustic transmitters from recaptured fish
Published in
Animal Biotelemetry, June 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40317-017-0130-2
Authors

Abby Schoonyan, Richard T. Kraus, Matthew D. Faust, Christopher S. Vandergoot, Steven J. Cooke, H. Andrew Cook, Todd A. Hayden, Charles C. Krueger

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 38 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 31%
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Researcher 5 13%
Professor 4 10%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 5 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 56%
Environmental Science 8 21%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Unknown 7 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2018.
All research outputs
#2,183,941
of 14,568,969 outputs
Outputs from Animal Biotelemetry
#62
of 147 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,723
of 265,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Biotelemetry
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,568,969 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 147 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,674 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them