↓ Skip to main content

De-escalation treatment protocols for human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
De-escalation treatment protocols for human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010271.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liam Masterson, Daniel Moualed, Ajmal Masood, Raghav C Dwivedi, Richard Benson, Jane C Sterling, Kirsty M Rhodes, Holger Sudhoff, Piyush Jani, Peter Goon

Abstract

Human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas are a distinct subgroup of tumours that may have a better prognosis than traditional tobacco/alcohol-related disease. Iatrogenic complications, associated with conventional practice, are estimated to cause mortality of approximately 2% and high morbidity. As a result, clinicians are actively investigating the de-escalation of treatment protocols for disease with a proven viral aetiology.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 130 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 19%
Researcher 22 16%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Other 13 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 10%
Other 23 17%
Unknown 23 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Psychology 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 33 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2014.
All research outputs
#2,773,035
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,954
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,639
of 185,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#111
of 196 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 77th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 196 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.