↓ Skip to main content

Non-penetrating filtration surgery versus trabeculectomy for open-angle glaucoma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 1996
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Non-penetrating filtration surgery versus trabeculectomy for open-angle glaucoma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 1996
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007059.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eldaly MA, Bunce C, Elsheikha OZ, Wormald R

Abstract

Glaucoma is the second commonest cause of blindness worldwide. Non-penetrating glaucoma surgeries have been developed as a safer and more acceptable surgical intervention to patients compared to conventional procedures.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 38 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 15%
Student > Master 6 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Researcher 6 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Other 11 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 70%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 10%
Unspecified 3 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 2 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2014.
All research outputs
#2,152,378
of 6,303,760 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,195
of 7,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,817
of 142,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#135
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 6,303,760 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 65th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,430 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.