↓ Skip to main content

Non-penetrating filtration surgery versus trabeculectomy for open-angle glaucoma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Non-penetrating filtration surgery versus trabeculectomy for open-angle glaucoma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007059.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohamed A Eldaly, Catey Bunce, Ola Z ElSheikha, Richard Wormald

Abstract

Glaucoma is the second commonest cause of blindness worldwide. Non-penetrating glaucoma surgeries have been developed as a safer and more acceptable surgical intervention to patients compared to conventional procedures.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 85 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 14%
Other 11 13%
Researcher 11 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 13%
Student > Master 11 13%
Other 18 21%
Unknown 13 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 59%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 15 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2014.
All research outputs
#6,788,899
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,253
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,399
of 185,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#157
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,987 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.