↓ Skip to main content

Frameless versus classical intrauterine device for contraception

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Frameless versus classical intrauterine device for contraception
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003282.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul O'Brien, Caroline C Marfleet

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 2%
India 1 2%
Unknown 41 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 19%
Researcher 6 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Other 11 26%
Unknown 6 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 56%
Social Sciences 6 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 9 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2017.
All research outputs
#3,639,769
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,910
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,519
of 263,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#148
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,168 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.