↓ Skip to main content

The Mad Hatter’s corporate tea party

Overview of attention for article published in Managerial Auditing Journal, August 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Mad Hatter’s corporate tea party
Published in
Managerial Auditing Journal, August 2003
DOI 10.1108/02686900310482641
Authors

Philomena Leung, Barry J. Cooper

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 8%
Nigeria 1 4%
Portugal 1 4%
Unknown 21 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 24%
Student > Bachelor 5 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Professor 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 1 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 15 60%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 12%
Computer Science 2 8%
Social Sciences 2 8%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 1 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2013.
All research outputs
#7,572,296
of 12,117,299 outputs
Outputs from Managerial Auditing Journal
#24
of 68 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,098
of 268,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Managerial Auditing Journal
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,117,299 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 68 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,366 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.