You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The disconnect between evidence and practice: a systematic review of person‐centred interventions and training manuals for care home staff working with people with dementia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/gps.4072 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jane Fossey, Sarah Masson, Jane Stafford, Vanessa Lawrence, Anne Corbett, Clive Ballard |
| Abstract |
The overall objective is to determine the availability of person-centred intervention and training manuals for dementia care staff with clinical trial evidence of efficacy. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 197 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 33 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 15% |
| Researcher | 23 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 37 | 18% |
| Unknown | 47 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 15% |
| Psychology | 30 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 8% |
| Arts and Humanities | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 32 | 16% |
| Unknown | 52 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2018.
All research outputs
#2,587,356
of 24,571,708 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
#386
of 2,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,749
of 229,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
#3
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,571,708 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,535 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.