↓ Skip to main content

The disconnect between evidence and practice: a systematic review of person-centred interventions and training manuals for care home staff working with people with dementia

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
Title
The disconnect between evidence and practice: a systematic review of person-centred interventions and training manuals for care home staff working with people with dementia
Published in
International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, February 2014
DOI 10.1002/gps.4072
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jane Fossey, Sarah Masson, Jane Stafford, Vanessa Lawrence, Anne Corbett, Clive Ballard

Abstract

The overall objective is to determine the availability of person-centred intervention and training manuals for dementia care staff with clinical trial evidence of efficacy.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 2%
United States 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 123 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 21%
Student > Master 22 17%
Researcher 17 13%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 27 21%
Unknown 12 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 24%
Psychology 24 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 19%
Social Sciences 14 11%
Arts and Humanities 4 3%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 13 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2018.
All research outputs
#1,374,210
of 12,504,607 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
#218
of 1,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,488
of 186,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
#1
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,504,607 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,663 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.