↓ Skip to main content

The disconnect between evidence and practice: a systematic review of person-centred interventions and training manuals for care home staff working with people with dementia

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The disconnect between evidence and practice: a systematic review of person-centred interventions and training manuals for care home staff working with people with dementia
Published in
International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, February 2014
DOI 10.1002/gps.4072
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jane Fossey, Sarah Masson, Jane Stafford, Vanessa Lawrence, Anne Corbett, Clive Ballard

Abstract

The overall objective is to determine the availability of person-centred intervention and training manuals for dementia care staff with clinical trial evidence of efficacy.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 130 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 21%
Student > Master 24 18%
Researcher 17 13%
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Other 28 21%
Unknown 12 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 24%
Psychology 26 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 19%
Social Sciences 13 10%
Arts and Humanities 4 3%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 13 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2018.
All research outputs
#1,796,021
of 14,535,828 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
#303
of 1,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,068
of 188,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
#3
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,535,828 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,287 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.