↓ Skip to main content

Reduced salt intake compared to normal dietary salt, or high intake, in pregnancy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 1999
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reduced salt intake compared to normal dietary salt, or high intake, in pregnancy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 1999
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001687
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lelia Duley, David J Henderson-Smart

Abstract

In the past women have been advised that lowering their salt intake might reduce their risk of pre-eclampsia. Although this practice has largely ceased, it remains important to assess the evidence about possible effects of advice to alter dietary salt intake during pregnancy.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Ireland 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 54 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 19%
Student > Master 10 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 18%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 7 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 58%
Psychology 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Sports and Recreations 2 4%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 8 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2014.
All research outputs
#1,018,175
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,938
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,797
of 186,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#76
of 190 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 190 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.