↓ Skip to main content

The value of plantation forests for plant, invertebrate and bird diversity and the potential for cross-taxon surrogacy

Overview of attention for article published in Biodiversity & Conservation, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The value of plantation forests for plant, invertebrate and bird diversity and the potential for cross-taxon surrogacy
Published in
Biodiversity & Conservation, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10531-014-0627-4
Authors

Sandra Irwin, Scott M. Pedley, Linda Coote, Anke C. Dietzsch, Mark W. Wilson, Anne Oxbrough, Oisín Sweeney, Karen M. Moore, Rebecca Martin, Daniel L. Kelly, Fraser J. G. Mitchell, Thomas C. Kelly, John O’Halloran

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 3%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 96 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 15%
Researcher 14 13%
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 15 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 43%
Environmental Science 28 27%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 <1%
Physics and Astronomy 1 <1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 23 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2021.
All research outputs
#3,819,134
of 20,027,474 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity & Conservation
#611
of 2,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,540
of 198,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity & Conservation
#12
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,027,474 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,059 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,892 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.