↓ Skip to main content

Formal Concept Analysis

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 5: On the Usability of Probably Approximately Correct Implication Bases
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
On the Usability of Probably Approximately Correct Implication Bases
Chapter number 5
Book title
Formal Concept Analysis
Published in
arXiv, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-59271-8_5
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-959270-1, 978-3-31-959271-8
Authors

Daniel Borchmann, Tom Hanika, Sergei Obiedkov

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 33%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 33%
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 5 83%
Physics and Astronomy 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2017.
All research outputs
#14,362,528
of 24,998,746 outputs
Outputs from arXiv
#204,207
of 1,020,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,218
of 323,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age from arXiv
#3,927
of 16,996 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,998,746 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,020,287 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,029 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16,996 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.