You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Safety and reliability of radio frequency identification devices in magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Patient Safety in Surgery, February 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1754-9493-4-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas Steffen, Roger Luechinger, Simon Wildermuth, Christian Kern, Christian Fretz, Jochen Lange, Franc H Hetzer |
| Abstract |
Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) devices are becoming more and more essential for patient safety in hospitals. The purpose of this study was to determine patient safety, data reliability and signal loss wearing on skin RFID devices during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) scanning. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 18% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| Australia | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 7 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
| Scientists | 3 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Turkey | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 56 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 17 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 22% |
| Computer Science | 10 | 17% |
| Engineering | 8 | 14% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 19 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,843,538
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Patient Safety in Surgery
#28
of 253 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,371
of 172,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient Safety in Surgery
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 253 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them