You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Meta-analysis of randomized trials: evaluation of benefit from gemcitabine-based combination chemotherapy applied in advanced pancreatic cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Cancer, March 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2407-8-82 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Volker Heinemann, Stefan Boeck, Axel Hinke, Roberto Labianca, Christophe Louvet |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| China | 2 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 143 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 17% |
| Researcher | 24 | 16% |
| Other | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 8% |
| Professor | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 37 | 24% |
| Unknown | 28 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 70 | 46% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 7% |
| Engineering | 5 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 9% |
| Unknown | 33 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2017.
All research outputs
#15,466,074
of 22,982,639 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#4,152
of 8,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,231
of 81,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#12
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,982,639 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,351 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,520 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.