You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Involving patients in setting priorities for healthcare improvement: a cluster randomized trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-9-24 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Antoine Boivin, Pascale Lehoux, Réal Lacombe, Jako Burgers, Richard Grol |
| Abstract |
Patients are increasingly seen as active partners in healthcare. While patient involvement in individual clinical decisions has been extensively studied, no trial has assessed how patients can effectively be involved in collective healthcare decisions affecting the population. The goal of this study was to test the impact of involving patients in setting healthcare improvement priorities for chronic care at the community level. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 103 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 39 | 38% |
| Canada | 23 | 22% |
| United States | 5 | 5% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 32 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 58 | 56% |
| Scientists | 24 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 17 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 281 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 272 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 45 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 8% |
| Other | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 67 | 24% |
| Unknown | 51 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 90 | 32% |
| Social Sciences | 37 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 35 | 12% |
| Psychology | 10 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 37 | 13% |
| Unknown | 65 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 80. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2023.
All research outputs
#542,390
of 25,754,670 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#39
of 1,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,860
of 239,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#2
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,754,670 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,821 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,769 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.