↓ Skip to main content

Biofortification of wheat grain with iron and zinc: integrating novel genomic resources and knowledge from model crops

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
14 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
187 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
307 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biofortification of wheat grain with iron and zinc: integrating novel genomic resources and knowledge from model crops
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2014.00053
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philippa Borrill, James M. Connorton, Janneke Balk, Anthony J. Miller, Dale Sanders, Cristobal Uauy

Abstract

Wheat, like many other staple cereals, contains low levels of the essential micronutrients iron and zinc. Up to two billion people worldwide suffer from iron and zinc deficiencies, particularly in regions with predominantly cereal-based diets. Although wheat flour is commonly fortified during processing, an attractive and more sustainable solution is biofortification, which requires developing new varieties of wheat with inherently higher iron and zinc content in their grains. Until now most studies aimed at increasing iron and zinc content in wheat grains have focused on discovering natural variation in progenitor or related species. However, recent developments in genomics and transformation have led to a step change in targeted research on wheat at a molecular level. We discuss promising approaches to improve iron and zinc content in wheat using knowledge gained in model grasses. We explore how the latest resources developed in wheat, including sequenced genomes and mutant populations, can be exploited for biofortification. We also highlight the key research and practical challenges that remain in improving iron and zinc content in wheat.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 307 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 300 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 20%
Researcher 52 17%
Student > Master 29 9%
Student > Bachelor 24 8%
Student > Postgraduate 15 5%
Other 53 17%
Unknown 74 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 157 51%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 7%
Environmental Science 7 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 2%
Computer Science 4 1%
Other 23 7%
Unknown 88 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2015.
All research outputs
#2,354,609
of 25,930,295 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#949
of 24,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,753
of 321,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#2
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,930,295 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,968 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.