↓ Skip to main content

Evidence for a modest undercount bias in early historical Atlantic tropical cyclone counts

Overview of attention for article published in Geophysical Research Letters, November 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
57 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Evidence for a modest undercount bias in early historical Atlantic tropical cyclone counts
Published in
Geophysical Research Letters, November 2007
DOI 10.1029/2007gl031781
Authors

Michael E. Mann, Thomas A. Sabbatelli, Urs Neu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
United States 1 2%
China 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 46 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 44%
Student > Master 8 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 3 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 25 50%
Environmental Science 10 20%
Engineering 4 8%
Computer Science 2 4%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 7 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2022.
All research outputs
#990,225
of 26,052,823 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#1,988
of 22,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,586
of 168,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#6
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,052,823 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,020 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.