↓ Skip to main content

Experiments in no-impact control of dingoes: comment on Allen et al. 2013

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Zoology, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
21 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Experiments in no-impact control of dingoes: comment on Allen et al. 2013
Published in
Frontiers in Zoology, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1742-9994-11-17
Pubmed ID
Authors

Johnson CN, Crowther MS, Dickman CR, Letnic MI, Newsome TM, Nimmo DG, Ritchie EG, Wallach AD, Christopher N Johnson, Mathew S Crowther, Chris R Dickman, Michael I Letnic, Thomas M Newsome, Dale G Nimmo, Euan G Ritchie, Arian D Wallach

Abstract

There has been much recent debate in Australia over whether lethal control of dingoes incurs environmental costs, particularly by allowing increase of populations of mesopredators such as red foxes and feral cats. Allen et al. (2013) claim to show in their recent study that suppression of dingo activity by poison baiting does not lead to mesopredator release, because mesopredators are also suppressed by poisoning. We show that this claim is not supported by the data and analysis reported in Allen et al.'s paper.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 5%
Germany 1 3%
Unknown 34 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 22%
Other 6 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 16%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Master 4 11%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 2 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 46%
Environmental Science 9 24%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 5%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 3 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2016.
All research outputs
#1,136,340
of 13,185,699 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Zoology
#96
of 482 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,305
of 187,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Zoology
#3
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,185,699 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 482 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.