↓ Skip to main content

Explaining socio-economic differences in intention to smoke among primary school children

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Explaining socio-economic differences in intention to smoke among primary school children
Published in
BMC Public Health, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-191
Pubmed ID
Authors

Henricus-Paul Cremers, Anke Oenema, Liesbeth Mercken, Math Candel, Hein de Vries

Abstract

Smoking prevalence is higher among low socio-economic status (LSES) groups, and this difference may originate from a higher intention to smoke in childhood. This study aims to identify factors that explain differences in intention to smoke between children living in high socio-economic status (HSES) and LSES neighbourhoods.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 116 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 19%
Student > Master 21 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 16%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Other 6 5%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 26 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 23 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 14%
Social Sciences 13 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 4%
Other 22 19%
Unknown 31 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2017.
All research outputs
#6,775,468
of 22,745,803 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,072
of 14,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,985
of 224,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#126
of 276 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,745,803 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,442 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 276 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.