↓ Skip to main content

Early life programming as a target for prevention of child and adolescent mental disorders

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
15 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
125 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
277 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Early life programming as a target for prevention of child and adolescent mental disorders
Published in
BMC Medicine, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-12-33
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew James Lewis, Megan Galbally, Tara Gannon, Christos Symeonides

Abstract

This paper concerns future policy development and programs of research for the prevention of mental disorders based on research emerging from fetal and early life programming. The current review offers an overview of findings on pregnancy exposures such as maternal mental health, lifestyle factors, and potential teratogenic and neurotoxic exposures on child outcomes. Outcomes of interest are common child and adolescent mental disorders including hyperactive, behavioral and emotional disorders. This literature suggests that the preconception and perinatal periods offer important opportunities for the prevention of deleterious fetal exposures. As such, the perinatal period is a critical period where future mental health prevention efforts should be focused and prevention models developed. Interventions grounded in evidence-based recommendations for the perinatal period could take the form of public health, universal and more targeted interventions. If successful, such interventions are likely to have lifelong effects on (mental) health.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 277 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 272 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 16%
Student > Bachelor 39 14%
Student > Master 38 14%
Researcher 22 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 6%
Other 49 18%
Unknown 68 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 19%
Psychology 50 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 5%
Other 39 14%
Unknown 85 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2018.
All research outputs
#1,507,452
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,066
of 4,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,781
of 238,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#15
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,067 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.