↓ Skip to main content

Can uncertainties in sea ice albedo reconcile patterns of data‐model discord for the Pliocene and 20th/21st centuries?

Overview of attention for article published in Geophysical Research Letters, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Can uncertainties in sea ice albedo reconcile patterns of data‐model discord for the Pliocene and 20th/21st centuries?
Published in
Geophysical Research Letters, March 2014
DOI 10.1002/2013gl058872
Authors

Fergus W. Howell, Alan M. Haywood, Aisling M. Dolan, Harry J. Dowsett, Jane E. Francis, Daniel J. Hill, Steven J. Pickering, James O. Pope, Ulrich Salzmann, Bridget S. Wade

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 3%
Unknown 29 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Professor 3 10%
Other 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 3 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 20 67%
Environmental Science 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Chemistry 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2014.
All research outputs
#2,752,250
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#5,025
of 21,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,066
of 237,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#77
of 313 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,518 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,012 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 313 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.