↓ Skip to main content

Best practices for assessing forage fish fisheries-seabird resource competition

Overview of attention for article published in Fisheries Research, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Best practices for assessing forage fish fisheries-seabird resource competition
Published in
Fisheries Research, October 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.fishres.2017.05.018
Authors

William J. Sydeman, Sarah Ann Thompson, Tycho Anker-Nilssen, Mayumi Arimitsu, Ashley Bennison, Sophie Bertrand, Philipp Boersch-Supan, Charlotte Boyd, Nicole C. Bransome, Robert J.M. Crawford, Francis Daunt, Robert W. Furness, Dimas Gianuca, Amanda Gladics, Laura Koehn, Jennifer W. Lang, Elizabeth Logerwell, Taryn L. Morris, Elizabeth M. Phillips, Jennifer Provencher, André E. Punt, Claire Saraux, Lynne Shannon, Richard B. Sherley, Alejandro Simeone, Ross M. Wanless, Sarah Wanless, Stephani Zador

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 166 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 23%
Researcher 34 20%
Student > Master 25 15%
Student > Bachelor 14 8%
Other 11 7%
Other 19 11%
Unknown 25 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 62 37%
Environmental Science 38 23%
Unspecified 7 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 1%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 35 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2021.
All research outputs
#2,368,572
of 22,982,639 outputs
Outputs from Fisheries Research
#197
of 2,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,209
of 322,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fisheries Research
#5
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,982,639 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,952 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,385 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.