↓ Skip to main content

Psychological treatments for the management of irritable bowel syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
146 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
203 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Psychological treatments for the management of irritable bowel syndrome
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006442.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ingeborg L Zijdenbos, Niek J de Wit, Geert J van der Heijden, Gregory Rubin, A Otto Quartero

Abstract

No consensus exists on the optimal treatment for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Psychological treatments are increasingly advocated but their effectiveness is unclear.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 196 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 19%
Student > Bachelor 32 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 15%
Researcher 29 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 37 18%
Unknown 23 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 78 38%
Psychology 44 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 7%
Social Sciences 12 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Other 17 8%
Unknown 30 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,662,006
of 16,651,463 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,194
of 11,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,384
of 191,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#82
of 200 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,651,463 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,561 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 200 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.