↓ Skip to main content

Psychological treatments for the management of irritable bowel syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
130 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Psychological treatments for the management of irritable bowel syndrome
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006442.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ingeborg L Zijdenbos, Niek J de Wit, Geert J van der Heijden, Gregory Rubin, A Otto Quartero

Abstract

No consensus exists on the optimal treatment for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Psychological treatments are increasingly advocated but their effectiveness is unclear.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Spain 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 153 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 18%
Researcher 24 15%
Student > Bachelor 22 14%
Unspecified 16 10%
Other 40 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 39%
Psychology 42 26%
Unspecified 20 13%
Social Sciences 11 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 7%
Other 14 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2014.
All research outputs
#6,954,996
of 12,101,174 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,154
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,554
of 195,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#142
of 169 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,101,174 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,768 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 169 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.